Part C: PBLA Programming and Administration
Getting Ready for PBLA in Our Program
Getting Ready for PBLA in Our Program
The use of Portfolio-Based Language Assessment (PBLA) in ESL classrooms has been demonstrated to benefit teachers and promote student learning. Its implementation, however, impacts not only teachers and students but also program administrators.1 It is up to a program’s administrator to provide leadership, supervision, motivation, and support, and to create optimum conditions for successful PBLA implementation. (See Conditions for Success below.)
The implementation of PBLA may necessitate a shift over time in how programs do things. The program may experience growing pains and ups and downs in enthusiasm and commitment as teachers experience success or encounter frustration. This is normal in a long-term change initiative. It is helpful if administrators can anticipate and plan for the implementation of PBLA and develop strategies to manage the change process effectively.
Communication between instructor and student is greatly enhanced through this [PBLA] process. The students absolutely love it. They have a much better understanding of their abilities. But the biggest impact is the standardization of information between programs and service providers. Students move around with portfolios that have demonstrations of what they are able to do. Their next instructor spends much less time assessing where they are at when they enter the class.
– Shirley Graham,
LINC and ESL Coordinator,
Ottawa-Carleton District School Board,
2013 TESL Canada Conference presentation
This section provides suggestions to help you get ready for PBLA and ensure successful implementation in your program.
Systemic change is complex and long term. The literature on change management, especially in the context of education, provides considerable insight and ways forward for the implementation of PBLA. The following key themes emerge:
PBLA is premised on the understanding that ongoing assessment is fundamental to good teaching. It also reflects a belief that teachers are best situated to observe and assess their students’ language proficiency in a variety of language tasks over time and that they have or can develop the necessary expertise. It is an approach that integrates assessment into reflective teaching practice and engages students in actively planning and thinking about their language learning.
Many aspects of PBLA will already be familiar to teachers and administrators; however, the introduction of PBLA may necessitate that they undertake familiar activities and strategies in different ways. PBLA is most successful in programs that meet certain conditions, as outlined below:
In planning for the implementation of PBLA, it is helpful if administrators and teachers assess their program, identify and build on those conditions for success currently in place, and develop a plan to address any gaps.
Implementation of a major change has a predictable pattern. The model developed by Everett Rogers (2003) could be applied to an initiative such as PBLA, as portrayed in the visual below:
In this visual, the Lead Instructor would be considered an Early Adopter. The job now is to begin to work with colleagues, some of whom will be in the early majority, the late majority and some will be laggards who are resistant to the change initiative.
Early majority colleagues are likely to be CIs who show signs of buy-in for PBLA and a willingness to embrace the change in some fashion. They will try out the new approaches and see the positive implications of PBLA. They are likely to participate actively in meeting and PD activities to promote change and will give the initiative their best effort. They may express concern about whether they are doing it ‘right.’ These colleagues can help sway others as they encounter successes.
Late majority colleagues may be fence-sitters. They comprehend the nature and intent of the change initiative but have reservations about what it means for them. They may ‘play the game’ superficially, but be somewhat judgmental and display some resistance or occasional anger. As they become more comfortable, they are likely to show more optimism. Building on the small successes of these colleagues can help move them off the fence to become committed to PBLA.
Laggards are likely to include those who are unaware or confused about the change initiative or those who have some knowledge of the emerging change but are resistant to change. They may pay lip service to the initiative by participating in the activities to acquire the knowledge and skills needed to implement PBLA, but may not carry the new skills over into their classrooms. Their pessimism may influence others and sabotage the initiative.
Often when implementing change your program may experience an Implementation Dip due to several important factors:
It is critical that you find ways to acknowledge and address challenges, celebrate small successes, and encourage instructors to keep on trying – particularly in the early stages of implementation. This will help prevent negative change (abandoning the process entirely or implementing it in a superficial manner that does not engage learners in their own learning). Below are some suggestions for building support.
First, begin to identify and build on the support and engagement of those who are open to PBLA. Having instructors who will champion PBLA along with you will help to engage the others.
Some strategies to build support include:
Resistance is a normal part of any major change process, and implementing PBLA is a major change. Instructors may feel apprehensive, criticized or even threatened.
Resistance can have a negative impact on change. The questions and objections of resistors need to be considered and addressed for the new initiative to work. However, constant, repetitious complainers can jeopardize Implementation. Below are some strategies to consider:
If, in spite of your best efforts, an individual will not try to implement any aspect of PBLA, you will need to decide how to address the issue.
The graphic below, developed by John Fisher (2012) illustrates some of the emotions instructors may go through as they implement PBLA.
Over time, effective strategies will emerge. Confidence is regained as new patterns emerge and effectiveness exceeds original level of competence. Learning and transition take time, but the benefits to learners and instructors over all is worth the effort.
1The term program administrator is used in this guide to refer to the person responsible for the LINC program, including supervising and managing classroom teachers.
2Many students with limited formal education in L1 face many language-learning challenges. Although they require ongoing support and direction from their teachers, it is important to help them identify goals and assume more of the responsibility for their language learning.